Selfless or realistic?
Or maybe both.
Here's the great Renata Tebaldi in a 1995 interview in the New York Times (link requires registration):
"I was in love many times," she said, flashing her dimpled smile. "This is very good for a woman." But she added, "How could I have been a wife, a mother and a singer? Who takes care of the piccolini when you go around the world? Your children would not call you Mama, but Renata."
Truly one of the greatest voices of all time, and a terrific singer on top of it all. Jussi Björling, in his final broadcast interview, listed her as one of his favorite singing partners. And it is heartening to know that she didn't inflict a life of loneliness and absent parents on putative children. That's really making a sacrifice for your career, for art and for the world.
She will be missed.
EDITED TO ADD:
I do NOT mean that refraining from marriage or from having children is normally a good thing; but if you are in a very dangerous profession, like skydiving instruction, or a highly public, demanding profession, like being an international opera star, it is certainly better to refrain than to have children and then treat them like baggage or put them in the kennel for weeks at a time while you go galivanting around the globe. So when I say she made a sacrifice for art, I mean that she gave up whatever measure of happiness and fulfillment she might have had from marriage and childbearing to fulfill the incredible gift God had given her.
Other singers have reduced their public performing commitments (like Eileen Farrell, for instance) to spend more time with their families, but I won't condemn Tebaldi for choosing the other road. After all, it's also possible that she considered herself the center of the universe and might have made a miserable mother; so it seems to me she chose best for her own situation.


