Yesterday at
Amy's place there was an interesting
post about the latest
trend among pet owners: the "Bark Mitzvah."
Look: I love my dog. And, as you can tell from the vitriol directed at "childless couples" in the comments box, I'm exactly the last person anyone wants to hear from about this. Of course, that rarely prevents my speaking my mind (or blogging it, as the case may be). So I am prepared to opine.
First of all, as I commented at Amy's, animals
don't need religious rituals, other than the occasional (and optional) blessing.
They don't sin. Even though I know full well that my dog knows acceptable from unacceptable behavior, she doesn't have the
knowledge of good and evil that is a prerequisite for sin. What's more, making a dog a
bar mitzvah makes a mockery of the ritual. Jesus even
said something about the distinction between dogs and children.
Still, it galls me to be told that spending money on my dog is wrong. One combox expert at Amy's even expresses resentment that people spend
perfectly good money on surgery to save their pets when there are starving children in India. (Okay, she doesn't say that literally, but the idea is there.) I am reminded that it was
Judas who complained about money being wasted when it could have been given to the poor. I don't want to be in that kind of company if I can help it.
It galls me more to be castigated by the fruitful for failing to have children. To those who think we should be ashamed, I am reminded of
Hagar and
Penninah shaming their rivals because of their barrenness. I can only say: We tried. God has other plans for us, apparently. And I have every confidence that, in taking in this little dog from the shelter and giving her a good home we have done a good work in God's eyes. That good work is
not diminished by the undoubtedly much nobler and greater good works of others.
But I suppose the thing that galls me the most is this false dichotomy:
either you love children and are a good person,
OR you a selfish, materialistic and barren person who places animals above people. Well, it isn't that simple. Some of us animal-lovers would like to have children. But at age forty, after a good many years of trying, and now that Mrs. Yurodivi has (or, we hope,
has had) cancer, it just isn't going to happen for us. In fact, seeking to have children now would be a major threat to her health, and it would also be pretty reckless to have children knowing that there was a significant chance their Mama wouldn't be around to see them graduate from middle school.
It is written, do not tempt the Lord thy God. Trust is one thing, but insouciance is another; I'm not picking up any adders or gargling with lye anytime soon, either (although I have kinfolk who have done both of those things at church).
Some of my faithful readers (maybe both of them) may be turned off by this post, and lump me in with the selfish animal elevators. That's their prerogative. Believe me, if I had my choice, we'd have a houseful of kids, and they'd be doing the yardwork instead of me.
But you know what?
a) God has His plans.
b) I am not God (for which I am truly thankful).
c) I assume that my little family -- the wife, the dog and I -- all fit into those plans somehow.
End of rant. As a famous Roman governor once said,
Was ich gescrieben habe, das habe ich gescrieben.